Whose property is it?: Commentary

re: Richard W. Rahn, writing at The Washington Times, says, "... The Federal Communications Commission already has all the authority it needs to protect consumers against any potential abuse. If the advocates of "net neutrality" were to have their way, broadband deployment would be slower, product innovation would be reduced, and there would be fewer consumer choices. Thinking people and those who remember history have noticed markets tend to solve problems and government tends to create them. Competition, not "net neutrality," is the best consumer protection."...